GET EVERYONE BELIEVING IT WAS THE END TIMES
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/start-here/davids-blog/936-disclosurebinladen
"The hope was that these videos would get Muslims thinking the Mahdi -- the Islamic Messiah -- was coming.
Within Muslim prophecy, this would of course mean they were in "End Times" -- and it could potentially embolden them to take revolutionary action, since Paradise was now at hand -- whether they lived or died.
These revolutions, as former Forbes east-west editor Benjamin Fulford and others have indicated, are being deliberately instigated in a last-ditch attempt to create "regime change" and increase oil revenues."
===============
our comment: Mr Wilcock is quite wrong if he thinks (or make us think) that the Muslims will believe a UFO over Israel to be Mahdi ship. Rather they will assume it is one of the secret US or Israeli projects, even if they are ET craft. The Muslims will believe what their own spiritual leaders tell them about Mahdi - who he is and where/when he will land. They may not even read Wilcock's suggestions.
Why then Wilcock tells us that? Because we have to believe that.
Similar information/interpretation mix we can read about the crashed ET ship in Russia (2011). They were cat-like, according to the report. Not a pyramid, that was spotted a year before (2010). Strangely how a researcher like Wilcock omits such important details in the report he quotes in his article, only to surprisingly conclude that the crashed "pyramid" was one of "ours" similar to triangles...Strange! Perhaps he will explain in a similar way the other pyramids over Russia and also China? Or perhaps the real purpose is our minds to get away from any real explanation of who is behind the pyramids and spirals? The detail of one year between the pyramid spotted and the craft crashed is negligent for Wilcock. As well as the important info posted on a number of Russian sites of a "talk" between the pilots in the ET craft and the air controllers who heard cat-like sounds. Or the posted for a week image of a dead alien on RT.com frontpage, despite they said it was "faked" - after all they are an official media. But it was there anyway.
To declare that the pyramid seen long before, is little more different from a secret US/NSA triangle, after all the stories about Kremiln pyramid, and the deepest silence about the Chinese 2 octahedron pyramids, is quite a blunt move from Wilcock. We remember his and Hoagland's analysis of the pyramid and spiral. And we wondered why they didn't include 3-4 more spirals and at least the Chinese pyramids in their analyses. Now we know why Wilcock didn't. Perhaps he would also explain how the Kremlin pyramid is recorded before 2007 demolishing of Hotel Rossiya, visible on the daylight video? The video was posted immediately after the Russian spiral seen from Norway. The government-approved release of old footage is more than obvious, something that Hoagland admits anyway, despite of all the rest of his conclusions. Hoagland had a big evolution in his ideas to the extend to admit the existence of off-world civilization at galactic level in his last presentation on "Secret space program" conference in Amsterdam. Not so with Wilcock, if he comes out with the version that the pyramid is nothing more than a different kind of triangle that the Russians shoot at.
To declare that the pyramid seen long before, is little more different from a secret US/NSA triangle, after all the stories about Kremiln pyramid, and the deepest silence about the Chinese 2 octahedron pyramids, is quite a blunt move from Wilcock. We remember his and Hoagland's analysis of the pyramid and spiral. And we wondered why they didn't include 3-4 more spirals and at least the Chinese pyramids in their analyses. Now we know why Wilcock didn't. Perhaps he would also explain how the Kremlin pyramid is recorded before 2007 demolishing of Hotel Rossiya, visible on the daylight video? The video was posted immediately after the Russian spiral seen from Norway. The government-approved release of old footage is more than obvious, something that Hoagland admits anyway, despite of all the rest of his conclusions. Hoagland had a big evolution in his ideas to the extend to admit the existence of off-world civilization at galactic level in his last presentation on "Secret space program" conference in Amsterdam. Not so with Wilcock, if he comes out with the version that the pyramid is nothing more than a different kind of triangle that the Russians shoot at.
And how it happened that Wilcock included South Africa among the ET contacted countries after his last post in January? May be because BRIC organization included S.A. and became BRICS? So perhaps the ET contacts depend on the earth politics, or vice versus.
From now on, we will not count on ANY explanations or even data released by David Wilcock, unless there is other independent source. As we see, in one same article, Wilcock could both quote a source and turn the evidence 180 degree.
Be prepared of similar "substantial and convincing" explanations when the events start occurring. Still we can notice the difference between truth and delusion. But many people won't.
