Blessings of Revelation

Many of the Millennial Dreams posts have been left brain theology and I for one struggle to keep up. But left brain is not all there is to Revelation. In a nutshell Revelation is participating in His rightful eternal glory. Picture the cheering crowds with Christ on the throne.

And so we are blessed by reading Revelation. This book gives us our wonderful future in images and symbols. We in the church are the bride getting ready for our bridegroom. A wedding is the ultimate symbol in a book full of symbols.

We are the bride being prepared for our future
of worshipping Christ,
the Lamb of God,
on His throne
forever
and ever
in Heaven
where there is no
more death nor tears
and all of our existence and theology finally makes sense.

Our bridegroom may come at any moment.
Too wonderful and exciting!

Revelation promises a blessing. Apart from theology, authors and commentators, how are you being blessed by reading Revelation?

Wishes for the Millennium...

On this early Sunday morning I am at work fixing a critical on-line computer problem. I've just fixed it and am investigating the cause. I am looking forward for the curse of the Fall to be eliminated. It would be nice if it happened now and it effected computer systems.

Earl's Personal Purpose Statement

Some years ago I wrote my personal purpose statement in my blog, MetaSchema. The typical one for most Presbyterian/Reformed people usually follow is the Westminster Shorter Catechism: Q: What is the chief end of man? A. Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever. I agree with the statement, but I decided to take a different tack. It fleshes out my understanding of glorifying God and enjoying Him forever. I also tried to write this so someone without a Christian background could have some hope of understanding what I was saying. My purpose statement is:

Christ-Centered, Cross-Focused

It’s not original, it’s not catchy, it’s not grammatically correct for a purpose statement. Where are the verbs?

There are several reasons I selected this:

  • Jesus Christ is the goal of creation, and the goal of my life.
  • Jesus’ death on the cross is the pivotal work that Jesus did.
  • There are no verbs in this statement because God in Christ did all the work.

Christ is the eternal Son of God, the second person of the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). The Father created the universe through Christ, for Christ.

God, in addition to everything that he is, is holy and perfect. God demands perfection from me. I am anything but perfection. I fall far short of perfection in everything that I do. It’s not because of my finiteness, my weakness. It is because I have a deep streak of rebellion against God and all that he is (the term for this rebellion is sin). God is perfectly just in condemning me. There is no hope for me against the perfect God.

But God, in full cooperation with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, sent the eternal Son, Christ, who became the man Jesus. Jesus lived a perfect life and took on all the sin in my life and others who would place their faith in him, and took the punishment for my sin on the cross. God also gives Jesus’ perfect life, his righteousness, and gives it to me. All of this is done on God’s part, even the part where I awaken, to realize my sin, to have a desire for God, repenting about my rebellion, and relying on what Jesus has done for me in paying for my sin on the cross and having Jesus's good life credited to me -- all of this is done by God. This is the reason of the lack of verbs in my purpose statement. God has done it all for me in Jesus' perfect life and in Jesus' death on the cross.

Even as I continue walking in faith throughout my life, the growth is brought about by God. Hence there is still the lack of verbs in my purpose. It is all centered on Christ. Christ is there for me, and where I do any action is this: relying on Christ, seeking him where he can be found. The places where Christ can be found is what the Reformers in the Reformation referred to as the means of grace. These include reading the Bible, prayer, hearing the word of God preached, baptism, and communion. None of these things are things I do to make myself better, rather these are where God is, where I know that God interacts with me. Everything flows from this, including all the works that God has prepared in advance for me. This colors how I view the rest of the world.

"The Greatness of the Great Commission" by Dr. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

The Greatness of the Great Commission: The Christian Enterprise in a Fallen World

Download PDF File


"Save Souls, Not Cultures!"This has been the motto of twentieth-century evangelism. Having encountered heavy resistance to the prophet's message of comprehensive revival and restoration in history, modern evangelical Christianity has abandoned the prophets. Unlike Jonah, who grew weary of life in the belly of a whale, modern evangelicalism has not only grown accustomed to the Church's cultural irrelevance today, it has actually proclaimed this pathetic condition as God's plan for the "Church Age." But is it? Not according to Jesus' instructions to His Church: the discipline (putting under God's discipline) of all nations. "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen" (Matthew 28:19-20).


Paul makes it clear that the progressive expansion of Jesus' kingdom in history will continue until all things are under His dominion, on earth, before He returns physically to judge the world. "For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death" (I Corinthians 15-25-26).
*
This was David's message, too: The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies (Psalm 110:1-2).
*
In The Greatness of the Great Commission, Rev. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr. presents a comprehensive biblical case for God's comprehensive salvation and restoration in history. Sin is comprehensive; God's healing grace is no less comprehensive. Whenever sin reigns today, there God speaks to sinful man and offers a way of escape. "There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it" (I Corinthians 10:13). To argue that the Great Commission does not include every aspect of today's cultures - all of Satan's kingdom - is to argue that there is no way of escape in many areas of life.


The war between God's kingdom (civilization) on earth and Satan's kingdom (civilization) on earth is total, encompassing every aspect of life. The Great Commission calls the Church (in this "Church Age") to make a full-scale attack on modern humanist civilization, but always in terms of a positive message and practical program: a better way of life in every area of life. This is the greatness of the Great Commission. It must not be narrowed to exclude culture from God's special grace.


"Go therefore and disciple all nations." the Great Commission states that all nations are to be discipled. Sadly, today's evangelicals have reduced Jesus' last command to mean only that individuals and families are to be discipled. Dr. Gentry takes a careful look at the biblical context and background of the Great Commission. His conclusion? That when God tells us to take over the world, He means it! Gentry shows the biblical methods of world conquest, which do not involve political takeovers but rather service and evangelism.

"Why I Am A Postmillennialist" by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen -- Part 2


Question 2: What does the Bible teach about the nature of Christ's kingdom in earthly history before Christ's return? (little physical success? or lots of physical success?)


Matt. 28:18-20 Jesus has all power in heaven and earth. He is with the church and tells the church to disciple the nations.
Heb. 10:9-13 Christ is now sitting at the right hand of God reigning over all creation expecting that His kingdom is going to subdue all enemies.
Rev. 11:15 The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of His Christ; and He shall reign forever and ever. Jesus has already established His kingdom and is reigning.
Math. 12:28 Christ has already established His kingdom.
Psalm 2:8 The Son merely needs to ask the Father, and the Father will give Him the heathen for His inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for His possession.
Matt. 12:29 Jesus tells us that the establishment of His kingdom will have the effect of spoiling Satan's house. He has bound the strong man so that now He can take whatever the strong man once controlled (what was once under Satan's domination).
Rev. 20:1-3 When Jesus came into this world, He bound Satan. Christ did this, so that Satan would deceive the nations no more. Satan is still active but Christ specifically curtails Satan's ability to ruin the religious mentality of the nations, to lead the nations into superstition, idolatry, and unbelief.
Matt. 16:18 Christ is building His kingdom in the world through the church by the power of His Spirit. The gates of Hell shall not hold up against the onslaught of the church.
Heb. 2:9 Jesus is crowned with glory and honor.

Premillennialism teaches that Christ's enemies will be subdued, but physically by violence and threats AFTER Jesus returns.

But Scriptures teach that Christ is working through His Spirit to persuade the hearts of men to follow Him willingly.
Ps 110:3 People will give themselves willingly in the day of Christ's power.
Amillennialism teaches that Christ's enemies will be subdued, but AFTER Jesus returns, because in the New Heavens and New Earth all enemies will be banished. (Typically, the amillennialist thinks of the subduing of the nations [understood as the gentiles] in history as the kingdom of God being established in the gentile regions, but it does not mean that the gentiles in mass will be subdued. It is a representative conversion, rather than a wide spread conversion that is anticipated by the Great Commission.)
Thus, both premils and amils believe that the subduing of Christ's enemies occurs AFTER He returns.
It is distinctive to postmillennialists to believe that the Holy Spirit will bring a day of revival and that this world will belong to the Lord Jesus Christ someday if the church is faithful to its commission.
The postmillennialist asks the amillennialist to follow out his basically correct premises. If Satan is bound, then what do you expect to take place? The Bible gives reasons for confidence. Pick it up. Run with it. Let's go.
According to Paul, what is the timing of the subduing of the enemies of Christ? Consider 1 Cor. 15:20-28 >> Christ has risen from the dead. His rising is only the first fruits of a great harvest that is coming. Because Jesus rose from the dead, all of His people will rise from the dead. Christ's people will rise from the dead at His coming, then the end will ensue. When Christ comes and delivers the kingdom to His Father, He will have subdued all other opposition. The last enemy to be abolished is death. Death is defeated by the resurrection of the dead. The enemies of Christ must be subdued before the last enemy is subdued. Christ comes back, then we rise from the dead.
Thus the postmillennialist expects this glorious success for the kingdom to take place before Christ returns.
The confidence of the postmillennialist comes only from believing the promises and power of God.
Isaiah 9:6-7 Jesus will come and be made the Prince of Peace (God's king). And of the increase of His government and righteousness and justice and peace, there shall be no end. And this shall be accomplished not by human agency but by the zeal of Jehovah.
God is going to see to it that this kingdom grows in a mighty way. At Christ's return there will be a history of success with the church, not set backs.
The kingdom is like a mustard seed: from a very small start it grows to hugh proportions.
The kingdom works very subtlely but very thoroughly to permeate all areas, like leaven in bread dough that permeates throughout the loaf and causes it to rise.
According to the New Testament, Jesus is spoiling Satan's house right now. Christ is going to have every enemy subdued before the end. Jehovah's zeal is going to see to it.
Daniel 2:35,44,45 The day will come when mighty kingdoms will no longer exist. God is going to set up a kingdom that will supplant the kingdom of men. God's kingdom will grow into a mountain that will fill the earth: this is certain and sure.
Isaiah 2:2-4 In the latter days God will establish His house in His hill above all the others. God is going to exalt the church above all other kingdoms. As all nations come into the church they will learn God's law. As a result, the nations will no longer be consumed with matters of warfare.
Psalm 72:7-11 All nations shall serve Christ while moons (months) endure (while history is in operation). Those who dare to oppose Him are going to lick the dust.
Psalm 22:27 All the nations on earth are going to be converted (turned to Jehovah). This will occur before Jesus returns, because at His return there will be no more opportunity for conversion, because it will then be the end of history.
Isaiah 11:9 In that day (when all the above things promised are accomplished) the earth shall be full of the knowledge of Jehovah, as the water covers the sea (not just little representative puddles or drops here or there as in the amillennial view). This refers not to representative conversions from the nations, but of wide spread conversions.
Typically, the amillennialist professes no confidence of widespread growth of Christ's kingdom in history. Rather, some see the optimistic biblical promises as referring to the New Heavens and New Earth AFTER Christ's return. Others see these promises as referring to spiritual blessings within the church. However, some amillennialists expect almost a total lack of success of the church in history.
But the postmillennialist believes the expectations of Christ: that all His enemies will be subdued prior to His return. Yes, there will be suffering and struggles in many battles along the way. But in the end, Christ and His church will win and will triumph over all opposition in history. Then Christ will return and defeat the last enemy, death.
1 Corinthians 15:57 In spite of corruption, death, etc., God gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. But be steadfast, for our labor is not in vain in the Lord. Suffer? Yes, but unto victory.

Earl's Sanity Check 1: Non Contradiction

How I determine what escatological or end times viewpoint to adopt? I use an approach that I use for all Biblical studies. I approach it with several rules of thumb that interpretations must follow for me to consider it. This is the first part of a series of posts that I will publish from time to time specifying the rules I use to evaluate a viewpoint.

The first rule of thumb is that the view must be logically consistent. Why do I make this rule the very first rule rather than a central point of doctrine, such as the reliability of Scripture? The reason is that if logical consistency is not insisted from the very beginning, all attempts at reason and discussion are futile.

The basic law is:
Nothing can be true and false in the same sense (or same relation) at the same time.
For instance, we cannot say that at March 3, 2007 George Bush was the President of the United States and on March 3, 2007 George Bush was not the President of the United States. Someone who is sharp might say that on January 20, 2009 George Bush was the President of the United States and was not the President of the United States, since on that day the presidency was passed from George Bush to Barack Obama. However, a careful examination of the statement concerning George Bush shows this is true for certain times of the day but not for other times of the day.

Not only do we need to pay very close attention to the time issues, but we need to exercise care in the sense of the logical statements being made. For instance, some claim that the description of God as the Trinity is a logical contradiction. This is because God is one and at the same time God is three. Looking carefully at the creedal formulations of God as the Trinity uses different language to describe God's oneness (essence) from God's threeness (person). Because the one and three are stated in different senses or relations, the law of non-contradiction is not violated and so the creedal statement of the Trinity is logically consistent.

The rule not only applies to direct statements made about an interpretation, but it also applies to logical consequences that necessarily follow from an interpretation. Let me give an example. Suppose it is agreed that in principle Christ could return at any moment. Thus Christ could return this very day that you are reading this blog entry. Let us further suppose that an eschatological system was proposed where either a catastrophic period with a minimum duration spanning years must occur or a period of great visible advancement of the church must occur which will take at least a decade or more for it to happen. As we analyze either of these systems, we will discover as a necessary inference that Christ could not in principle return this day but that it would have to be delayed at least several years to several decades from now. While the advocates of either view would not state the obvious contradiction that Christ is going to return today and He will not return today, there is in the analysis that while they hold in principle Christ could return today, they also hold that Christ could not return today. This is a contradiction, and according to the law of non-contradiction, neither of these views can be true.

Why must this rule be assumed in the first place? Because imagine trying to argue a point without assuming this. It would mean anything goes. Discussion becomes meaningless. God exists and does not exist,. In fact, try to argue against the law of non-contradiction. It can't be done.

This rules out many systems of beliefs. For instance, the view that there is no absolute truth falls on its face because to assert that there is no absolute truth is the assert there is an absolute truth that there is no absolute truth.

In the area of eschatology, Jesus made several statements. The first is that you cannot pinpoint the time of Christ's second coming. There is an eschatological system that says the Christ will "rapture" the church (which is distinct from Christ's second coming) and that will start a precise countdown clock where the second coming will occur seven years later. This contradicts that you cannot pinpoint the time of Christ's second coming and that view must be rejected. The second is that Christ's second coming can occur any day. Any view which must delay Christ's return for the conditions to be met for Christ's return must also be rejected.

I'll Continue the series with another sanity check in a later post.

"Why I Am A Postmillennialist" by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen

"Why I Am A Postmillennialist" by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen

In a casual, not lecturing style Dr. Bahnsen presents in three downloadable audio files a simplified explanation from the Bible of why he believes the postmillennial system is the teaching of the Bible.

To download the three MP3 files ($1.99 each), click here.

Concerning millennial views, there are two questions to be asked and two attitudes for each question.

1. What does the Bible teach about the chronology of the history of Christ's kingdom, the flow of events? and 2. What does the Bible teach about the nature of Christ's kingdom in earthly history before Christ's return?

Question 1: What does the Bible teach about the chronology of the history of Christ's kingdom, the flow of events?

The first question we have to ask is:

In the future, does the Scripture allow for any great period of time between the return of Christ and the eternal state (i.e., premillennialism)? That is, does the Biblical chronology allow for a gap of 1,000 years to be inserted between the return of Christ and the bringing in of the New Heavens and the New Earth (i.e., the eternal state)?

If no such gap is allowed in Biblical chronology, then we must reject that particular view and all of the variants that go with it (rapture, timing of the tribulation [pre-, mid-, post-], identification of the Beast, the question of reinstituted animal sacrifices, etc.). We would then be left to answer the second question concerning the nature of Christ's kingdom.

In a simplified manner, what does the Bible teach on the question, then, of the chronology of the history of Christ's kingdom?

Acts 24:15

The Bible teaches us that a day is coming when there will be a general resurrection of men, both the just and the unjust.

John 5:28, 29

The Bible teaches that on a particular day and hour, Jesus will call everyone in the graves. It is at that point that men will be divided according to the resurrections: one to life, one to condemnation.

Thus, there is no room to insert 1,000 years between the resurrection to life which the just enjoy, and the resurrection to condemnation which the evil are going to experience.

Matthew 25:31,32,46

The Bible teaches, that a day is coming where Jesus will sit on His throne of glory and all the nations (no exceptions) will stand before Him. He will then make some go into the fold of the sheep (the righteous going into eternal life) and some into the fold of the goats (the evil going into eternal punishment).

Thus we see, with a general resurrection (all men being resurrected) and a general judgment (all men being judged) at one particular time, the Bible does not permit the insertion of a 1,000 year period between the return of Christ and the final judgment.

2 Thessalonians 1:7-10

There's a day coming where the following things will happen:
God's people, who are being afflicted, will no longer be afflicted but vengeance will come upon their afflictors, and they (God's people) will be glorified. The day is coming when those who do not believe will be judged with everlasting destruction, and those who do will be (1) relieved of their tribulation, and (2) glorified in their Savior. This is called the time of Christ's coming. It will be relief and judgment.

1 Thessalonians 4:13-17

Paul teaches here, that the coming of Jesus Christ (a public event, not a secret rapture), is with the resurrection of His saints.

So, 2 Thessalonians 1 teaches us that at His coming there will be relief for those who are afflicted (and they will be glorified in their Savior) and judgment upon those who disbelieve. In 1 Thessalonians 4 we learn that this will be the time that the saints are resurrected.

John 6:39,40,44

So, Jesus is coming to bring relief to His saints. And when He comes there will be a resurrection of all who have believed in Him. John tells us that according to Jesus, He will do this AT THE LAST DAY.

Is there any room for a 1,000 year period to be inserted? No, because when Jesus comes back, eternal destruction will come upon those who disbelieve. That will be the crack of doom for them.

1 Corinthians 15:22-28,52

Here we learn that the day of resurrection for the saints, which we have seen will be the last day of history according to Jesus, is going to take place and then the end will ensue. Paul says the day of resurrection will bring about the end, not 1,000 more years of drama. When Christ returns, His saints will be raised and He will deliver the kingdom to the Father, and that will be it.

Thus, the Bible does not teach the premillennial view, rather, the Bible teaches the postmillennial view as to the timing of events in history.

"Thy Kingdom Come" (Rev. Joe Morecraft Sermons)


Rev. Joe Morecraft addresses the meaning of "Thy Kingdom Come" in his 21 part series on the Lord's Prayer. Sermons 5-8 address the second petition, "Thy Kingdom Come".


Play or download these sermons, click here


"Thy Kingdom Come" (Westminster Larger Catechism)

The Westminster Larger Catechism answer to New Kid's question about the meaning of "Thy Kingdom Come" is found in question 191:

Question 191: What do we pray for in the second petition?

Answer: In the second petition (which is, Thy kingdom come), acknowledging ourselves and all mankind to be by nature under the dominion of sin and Satan, we pray, that the kingdom of sin and Satan may be destroyed, the gospel propagated throughout the world, the Jews called, the fulness of the Gentiles brought in; the church furnished with all gospel officers and ordinances, purged from corruption, countenanced and maintained by the civil magistrate: that the ordinances of Christ may be purely dispensed, and made effectual to the converting of those that are yet in their sins, and the confirming, comforting, and building up of those that are already converted: that Christ would rule in our hearts here, and hasten the time of his second coming, and our reigning with him forever: and that he would be pleased so to exercise the kingdom of his power in all the world, as may best conduce to these ends.

Comparing the Millennium and the Kingdom

In my earlier post to Earl I place the millenium in the future and was a Partial Preterist/Postmillenialist only so far. Okay, guys, after grappling and reading The Book of Revelation Made Easy I will give up my last sliver of pre-mil (didn't know it still was infecting me) and admit we are in the millennium now.

So I have another question.

When we pray thy kingdom come are we praying for the millennium? Or, are the Millennium and the Kingdom the same?

Earl's Cut to the Chase

I am guilty of diarrhea theology -- writing many words that muddies ideas and adds little clarification. New Kid rightly asks me to write plainly -- to cut to the chase. Here is what I believe concerning Revelation and eschatology:

  1. When Christ came 2000 years ago, He opened the new age in which we live. This is when the millennium began because salvation was now being offered to all the nations.
  2. How do we know we are in the millennium? The gospel is advancing throughout the world. Satan is bound, he cannot stop the spread of the gospel.
  3. We also live in the tribulation. That began with Christ's first advent and will continue until his second coming.
  4. I believe that Christ prophesied about the fall of Jerusalem in the Olivet discourse. But much of Christ coming in the clouds in glory speaks of the yet to happen second coming of Christ. I am open to a visitation of Christ in judgement in 70 AD, but that was not the close of the age then. The new age began with Christ's first advent and we are living in the millennial age that he ushered in.
  5. Revelation is first and foremost about: “Jesus is gonna win!” (Poythress' quote of a janitor who read Revelation). It is the gospel of God's redemption of his people throughout history. It is about God's grace granting perseverance, sealing the Christians, and keeping them through all difficulties and trials. Its the story of difficult times with a glorious ending. Its the story of God actively involved right now, Christ ruling with his iron rod right now and summing all things up.
  6. Revelation paints history in a series of overlays, repeated looks at history, painting different aspects of history. This view is called recapitulation.
  7. Some of what Revelation speaks of have historical identification. Nero is possibly one of these, but Nero is not the final word of that kind of history, but a pattern.
  8. There is nothing in principle that must happen before Jesus' second coming.
  9. There may or may not be a final great tribulation yet to come. If there is, we should be able to see signs of its coming -- but it may come very quickly. This may be accompanied by the great apostasy. Further, given what has happened globally in the past century to other Christians around the world, we may indeed be in the great tribulation.
  10. God's kingdom is advancing.
  11. Christians achieve victory throughout Revelation in an ironic way. In the eyes of the world, Christians look or will look defeated in persecution, trial, and death. But these are the very things through which Christians are vindicated and victorious.
In summary, Christ is ruling. Christ is active in all Christians' lives even when they are in the midst of intense persecution and suffering. Christians will persevere because they are sealed and protected by God. Thus Christians do not need to fear the future or worry whether they can "hang on" in difficulty -- God will make sure they hang on.


The view I hold to is sometimes called "idealism" (poor name), amillennialism (also a poor name because that is just one part of many things about the view and it is postmillennial), and eclectic (in that it seems to pull concepts from various other views).

"Understanding the Book of Revelation, Part 2" by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen.


In three lectures presented at a conference, Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen gives an overview of the book of Revelation and the various millennial positions and concludes with a positive presentation of the biblical view of last things.

These three lectures can be purchased for $1.99 each at the following
link:
http://www.cmfnow.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&Cate
gory=570
This is a continuation of the summary of the first lecture. I have republished the first part of the summary in red.
Conference Theme: Confidence About the Future
Lecture 1: Understanding the Book of Revelation - 1 of 3
Many have interest and curiosity about the future of economics,
politics, etc. for various reasons. But as Christians, we would like to
know what God has in store for planet earth because we are part of
His kingdom and plan, and we should be thinking His thoughts after
Him. First, Christians have and continue to argue about this.
Secondly, this subject appears to be very difficult. Most Christians
simply give up on trying to figure it out. Dr. Bahnsen's hope is that
upon completing these 3 lectures, his audience will have a sense of
understanding about God's plan for the future. Of course, he will not
be able in this short time to answer every conceivable question nor
persuade on every point. He hopes to encourage his audience with
the realization that they can understand God's word concerning the
future and that God has good news about the future. There is a
glorious future ahead. There may be many judgments and tough
times along the way, but our sovereign God is not going to turn
history over to the devil. Rather, God's kingdom is going to be the
final word and He is going to govern the nations upon the earth.
Thus, we have a glorious future to look forward to. This is not just
optimism or wishful thinking. God's word gives substance to the idea
of God's glorious future kingdom.
So, what does God's word teach about the future? Open your Bibles
to the book of Revelation. Remember, all Scripture is inspired of
God (2 Timothy 3:16, 17). As God's own word, it is profitable:
beneficial for teaching, correcting, reproving, and instructing us that
we may be furnished for every good work. But, it cannot be
beneficial to you if you don't read it; and it can only be beneficial if
you understand it.
1. The title of the book: Revelation, i.e., unveiling (not an
obscuring). Thus, you may understand what God wants you to know
about what He intends to do. God wants to open our eyes so we can
see.
Rev. 1:3 -- God expects us to respond in a certain way to this book.
He expects us to KEEP (i.e., respond to obediently) the book of
Revelation. God expects you and me to behave in a certain way in
the midst of history because of what He is going to reveal in this
book. If you don't read the book and understand it properly, how can
you obey it? You can't. Thus, get busy and read it in addition to the
rest of your Bible.
But, the book of Revelation is so difficult, you say. However, God
does not intend for this book to be difficult for you. Consider
Revelation 17. After John has been shown a very distressing picture
of a harlot that is sprawled out over the heads of a seven-headed
beast whose name is Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and All
Abominations of the Earth, he says that he wondered with a great
wonder (vs. 6). This wonder is the trembling type of wonder. What
should he make out of this? Then in verse 7, the angel said to him,
"Why did you wonder? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and
of the beast that carries her, who has the seven heads and ten horns."
Then the angel goes on to explain. Isn't that a comforting verse?
God didn't give us the book of Revelation to confuse us. He wants
us to read it and along the way He explains it to us. Although
particular images may be difficult, overall, the book is not all that
difficult to put together.
The book may be troublesome if you read it for something it doesn't
intend to be. You must respect the kind of literature that it is, i.e.,
highly figurative literature with visions, symbols, etc.
There is a school of thought that goes to the book of Revelation as
though it is a newspaper written ahead of time. But, is the book of
Revelation written like a newspaper narrative? A news report? Of
course not. The book of Revelation is very figurative with lots of
imagery and symbols. Some say they interpret the book of
Revelation literally (that is, as if it is devoid of images and symbols
that have to be interpreted). None, without hypocrisy, can make that
claim. No one reads the book of Revelation literally. Consider the
description of the Beast (Rev. 13): seven heads, ten horns, comes up
out of the sea. That could be literal. But no one in the Christian
church considers this as an actual created monster. The
dispensational school of thought often hypocritically criticizes those
who do not agree with their interpretation as not being literal, and
thus playing fast and loose with the text of Scripture. In fact,
dispensationalists do not read the book of Revelation "literally". You
must understand that the book of Revelation is very visionary,
dramatic, and highly figurative. But, remember, God promises to tell
us what it means (Rev. 17:7). Every Christian can take this clearly
written book and make sense out of it, even though it is highly
figurative.

2. What is the book of Revelation all about?
THEME:

What does God want us to know from the book of Revelation? He wants us to know that His kingdom, the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, is going to triumph over all opposition. The author, John, was on the isle of Patmos under persecution when he received this revelation from God. He was exiled because of his testimony to the word of God. The Christian church also was undergoing persecution. Under Emperor Nero, Christians were being severely persecuted. In Asia Minor at this time there was the emperor cult: the worship of the emperor as god himself. Eventually this cult spread throughout the Roman Empire. The seven churches identified in the book of Revelation are located in Asia Minor. Those in Asia Minor who would not worship the emperor were killed (often thrown to the lions in the stadium to entertain the public). There was great hatred of the Christian church by the Roman world,including even the Jews: those who professed to be the people of God. The Jews stirred up trouble for the Christians (see the book of Acts). In the midst of this persecution, John writes and says here is good news for you: Jesus is going to triumph over all opposition.
TIME PERIOD:

At the beginning and at the end of the book of Revelation, John clearly tells us the timing of the fulfillment of the prophecies given.
Rev. 1:1 -- things that must shortly come to pass
Rev. 1:3 -- the time is at hand
This timing refers to the main body, the most basic essential purpose of the book, that John is talking about, not every detail.
Rev. 22:6 -- things that must shortly come to pass
Rev. 22:10 -- the time is at hand
These things are going to begin to happen right away. The main body of the book of Revelation has to do with John's own day, the generation shortly to follow; the early days of the church.
OUTLINE OF THE BOOK:

The book has its own outline. The book has its own interpretive guide built right into it.
Rev. 1:19 -- Preceding this verse, John has been given a vision of the glorified Christ and he has given a description of this vision. This verse gives John his commission: Write about (1) what you have seen already, (2) the things that are contemporary, and (3) those things that will shortly come to pass hereafter.
Rev. 4:1 -- Now I am going to show you the things hereafter.
(1) WHAT YOU HAVE ALREADY SEEN: John has already seen the glorified Savior in the midst of the candelstands (i.e., the churches). Jesus is with the church, in its midst, as a glorified sovereign Savior. (Reminds us of Christ's ascension where He said He would be with His church always.) This is a figurative repetition of that promise. So as the church is in the midst of persecution, the glorified sovereign Savior, Christ, reminds His church that He is with them.
(2) THE THINGS THAT ARE NOW: Chapter 4 begins "hereafter". Chapter 1 deals with "what has already been seen". So, by subtraction, Chapters 2 and 3 deal with "the things that are now". Chapters 2 and 3 are letters to the seven churches in Asia Minor. The persistent theme in these seven letters (with one minor exception): an address to the minister (the angel) of the church, Christ is given a particular designation from the Revelation 1 vision, a commendation of the church, a rebuke of the church, an exhortation, then the formula "he that hath an ear let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches", and then a promise (about overcoming, triumphing) is made.
Christ speaks directly to His church, "Repent of the things that are wrong, be encouraged by My presence, and know that I will give a reward to those who overcome and are victorious in My name."
(3) THE THINGS THAT ARE HEREAFTER: So how far hereafter are we talking about? For the most part we are talking about the generations of the early church because "these are things that will shortly come to pass". That does not keep John from looking ahead to the Second Coming and the New Heavens and New Earth, but that is the P.S. almost at the end of the book. The main body of the prophecy of the things to take place hereafter (chapter 4 through the middle of chapter 20) have to do with two particular dramas. So why two particular sections? Because of literary clues. In chapters 4 and 5 John has introduced to him a seven sealed scroll. To get in to the scroll, the seals must be broken. At the breaking of each seal, John gets a preview of what is to come (kind of like the inside flap of the dust cover of a book that tells you what you are going to see in the book). Later on, John is given another book, a little book, and he is told he is to prophecy again, this time internationally over many nations, tongues, peoples, and kings (Rev. 10:7-11). Previously he's prophecied about one particular people and nation. Now he's going to prophecy about many. Thus there are two prophecies. Then at the end of the book of Revelation we see a reference to what God is going to do at the end of history. The important thing for the church at this time to know is that Christ is going to defeat all their enemies. They are going to see the victory of Christ's kingdom. So, there is going to be a judgment prophecy against a particular nation (i.e., Israel). God is going to be finally done covenantally with these people who crucified the Messiah. So John sees a prophecy where Israel is going to be destroyed by God. And then there is going to be an explanation in chapter 12 of how that victory was possible. That explanation will have to do with what goes on behind the scenes (i.e., a battle between principalities and powers). John explains that Satan has been cast down to earth from his position of ascendency. Satan has not been successful persecuting the Jewish church. Satan will persecute the Jewish church but he will not destroy those faithful Jews who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. Jerusalem will be destroyed, but God's people (who truly belong to Him) will escape to the mountains. Satan will then be wrathful all the more. So in chapter 13 John sees that Satan is working with another power (beast rising from the sea). Satan is behind the scenes and is foiled when God destroys the Jewish people and the temple (A.D. 70). But before the destruction, the Christians fled to the mountains and escaped the devastation. Thus Satan did not accomplish what he had tried, so he now goes to persecute the rest of the seed of the woman (i.e., the gentile church throughout the world). Now we see the second enemy, the beast rising from the sea (i.e., Rome and the Roman Empire). So, the seven sealed scroll deals with prophecy of judgment against Israel, and the little book deals with prophecy of judgment against the Roman Empire. Similarly, in chapter 20 John goes behind the scenes again and gives the explanation of how Christ's kingdom triumphed over the opposition of the Roman Empire. Not only had Satan been cast down to earth but had been bound by Jesus and cast into the pit of hell for a particular purpose (explained later in lecture 2).
So the book of Revelation tells us what is going to happen hereafter: God's going to judge those who persecute you (i.e., apostate Jews). Jerusalem will fall. The account for that is Satan has been cast down to earth. Satan is then going to go and persecute the rest of the church in the empire and the Roman Empire will persecute you but God will destroy the Roman Empire and only the kingdom of Jesus Christ will be sustained in history. Behind the scenes, the reason for that is that Satan has been bound so as not to deceive the nations anymore. Now the Great Commission can be fulfilled. Then at the end of that time, God will for a very short time release Satan and there will be apostacy. Jesus will then return in judgment on the world after we've seen this great world wide victory for His kingdom. Then there will be a final apostacy, Jesus will return, then the Great White Throne Judgment and the introduction of the New Heavens and New Earth (the eternal future that belongs to God's people).
So to recapitulate.
Jesus says, I am the glorified sovereign Savior, and I am with you. The Jews hate you, the Romans persecute you, but I am with you. I have all power, so you are going to obey Me and disciple the nations. In chapters 2 and 3 Jesus writes to the seven churches: I have things I want to commend, I have things I want to rebuke in you. Repent. I expect you to be a victorious, overcoming church. Surmount this opposition. My kingdom is going to prevail. Here is what is going to happen. I am going to judge those wicked Jews who are persecuting you. God in history is going to repay them. Thus we see the judgment on the Jewish people. Then we find out that is because Satan has been cast down to earth. But God's people will be victorious over the Jews because Satan is being controlled and dominated by God Himself. But Satan not being satisfied, is going to persecute the church in the Roman Empire as well. The Roman Empire will rise against the church, but I will destroy it as well. The vision of God destroying the Roman Empire is capped in Revelation 19 with the vision of Jesus Himself riding forth on a white horse going out and conquering all opposition. Jesus rides upon this white horse using a sword that proceeds from His mouth. This if figurative language (the sword is the word of God). This is a figurative description of the Great Commission being fulfilled. How is this possible. The millennial explanation in chapter 20 is that God is restraining Satan. Now the word of God, not Satan, is going to conquer the nations. Then at the very end of history, when there is a final apostacy, we will see that Jesus will return in judgment and introduce a New Heavens and New Earth wherein righteousness dwells, and God will wipe every tear from our eyes. This certainly is an encouragement to Christians under persecution. Jesus is going to have the final word in history and in eternity. And in eternity He will comfort me. All of my tribulation will have been worthwhile.

----------Next: A Brief Demonstration of This Thesis---------------

Some Groundwork

I'm going to quote from and briefly comment on a section of James Jordan's book "Through New Eyes" where he offers some helpful rules for interpreting biblical symbolism.

1."Biblical symbolism and imagery is not a code. The Bible does not use a symbol where a literal statement will do."

Jordan uses (coincidentally to the theme of this blog) the example of Revelation 13 and identifying the beast. By using the symbol of "beast" and the number "666" John is drawing together a host of prophetic associations. Jordan notes that John is alluding to "the beast in the Garden, Adam clothed in skins of beasts, Nebuchadnezzar turned into a beast (Daniel 4), the beasts in Daniel’s visions, the human beasts who rioted against Paul at Ephesus (1 Corinthians 15:32; Acts 19), etc." So while Nero is likely the most immediate "beast" John has in mind, he is not speaking only about Nero without reference to previous beasts or possibly future beasts.

2. "Biblical symbols do not exist in isolation. In the Bible, the entire symbolic world is one organized and unified worldview, a worldview that actually takes its rise in the first chapters of Genesis... The rest of the Bible simply unpacks their meanings."

This means that to understand Revelation (and, really, the whole of Scripture) we need to understand what is going on in the opening chapters of Genesis. We must keep in mind that while Genesis is the start of our Bibles, it is a product of the cultural and socio-linguistic context in which it was written.

3. "We must always have clear-cut Biblical indication for any symbol or image we think we have found. We don’t want to read the modern secular worldview into the Bible, but we don’t want to read the corrupt worldview of ancient Near-Eastern paganism into it either." (Bold in original text)

I should think this is common sense, but it is surprising how often commentators and lay-people of all stripes are guilty of doing this one way or another. While period ancient literature can be helpful we must take great care that we aren't reading another worldview into Scripture rather than letting Scripture dictate and shape our worldview.

4. "The heritage of the Church in systematic theology and in the history of exegesis is always a check on wild speculation."

Citing Ephesians 4:8, 10-11 Jordan admonishes, "The godly wisdom of these gifts, these men, is part of the treasure of the Church, and to ignore it is to despise the gifts of the Spirit." Our theology and exegesis, Jordan is saying, does not happen in a vacuum. We stand on the shoulders of those who came before us and we benefit from their godly exercising of their spiritual gifts. This is not to say that we are bounded by it, rather we should use our rich heritage as a tool to keep us from straying too far beyond our established orthodoxy.

5. "Biblical symbolism must be interpreted in terms of Biblical presuppositions and philosophy... The Bible has its own presuppositions and its own philosophy of type and allegory; we do not need to borrow anything from Plato."

Jordan is referring to the early Church and specifically to the school at Alexandria which was "notorious for allegorical and symbolic exegesis" by which they forced biblical teaching into Platonic categories and philosophy. Once again we want to make sure that Scripture is shaping our view and not the other way around. I think these interpretive rules, or guidelines, would be a big help in endeavoring to let Scripture do so, especially when talking about Revelation.





Cut to the Chase, Please

How are Postmillennialism and Partial Preterism different? How does Optimistic Amillennism that Earl subscribes to relate to this study? Or is Earl Eclectic or Ambivalent Eclectic? Maybe the answer is in an earlier posting, but at this point can we cut to the chase, simplify, give our “aha” moments in the pursuit of this topic? What is learned from each of the men that you, Bill and Earl, quote? Kindly give me the “aha”. Thanks.

"Understanding the Book of Revelation, Part 1" by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen


In three lectures presented at a conference, Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen gives an overview of the book of Revelation and the various millennial positions and concludes with a positive presentation of the biblical view of last things.

These three lectures can be purchased for $1.99 each at the following link:
http://www.cmfnow.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&Category=570

I will briefly summarize each lecture.

Conference Theme: Confidence About the Future

Lecture 1: Understanding the Book of Revelation - 1 of 3

Many have interest and curiosity about the future of economics, politics, etc. for various reasons. But as Christians, we would like to know what God has in store for planet earth because we are part of His kingdom and plan, and we should be thinking His thoughts after Him. First, Christians have and continue to argue about this. Secondly, this subject appears to be very difficult. Most Christians simply give up on trying to figure it out. Dr. Bahnsen's hope is that upon completing these 3 lectures, his audience will have a sense of understanding about God's plan for the future. Of course, he will not be able in this short time to answer every conceivable question nor persuade on every point. He hopes to encourage his audience with the realization that they can understand God's word concerning the future and that God has good news about the future. There is a glorious future ahead. There may be many judgments and tough times along the way, but our sovereign God is not going to turn history over to the devil. Rather, God's kingdom is going to be the final word and He is going to govern the nations upon the earth. Thus, we have a glorious future to look forward to. This is not just optimism or wishful thinking. God's word gives substance to the idea of God's glorious future kingdom.
So, what does God's word teach about the future? Open your Bibles to the book of Revelation. Remember, all Scripture is inspired of God (2 Timothy 3:16, 17). As God's own word, it is profitable: beneficial for teaching, correcting, reproving, and instructing us that we may be furnished for every good work. But, it cannot be beneficial to you if you don't read it; and it can only be beneficial if you understand it.

1. The title of the book: Revelation, i.e., unveiling (not an obscuring). Thus, you may understand what God wants you to know about what He intends to do. God wants to open our eyes so we can see.
Rev. 1:3 -- God expects us to respond in a certain way to this book. He expects us to KEEP (i.e., respond to obediently) the book of Revelation. God expects you and me to behave in a certain way in the midst of history because of what He is going to reveal in this book. If you don't read the book and understand it properly, how can you obey it? You can't. Thus, get busy and read it in addition to the rest of your Bible.
But, the book of Revelation is so difficult, you say. However, God does not intend for this book to be difficult for you. Consider Revelation 17. After John has been shown a very distressing picture of a harlot that is sprawled out over the heads of a seven-headed beast whose name is Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and All Abominations of the Earth, he says that he wondered with a great wonder (vs. 6). This wonder is the trembling type of wonder. What should he make out of this? Then in verse 7, the angel said to him, "Why did you wonder? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, who has the seven heads and ten horns." Then the angel goes on to explain. Isn't that a comforting verse? God didn't give us the book of Revelation to confuse us. He wants us to read it and along the way He explains it to us. Although particular images may be difficult, overall, the book is not all that difficult to put together.
The book may be troublesome if you read it for something it doesn't intend to be. You must respect the kind of literature that it is, i.e., highly figurative literature with visions, symbols, etc.
There is a school of thought that goes to the book of Revelation as though it is a newspaper written ahead of time. But, is the book of Revelation written like a newspaper narrative? A news report? Of course not. The book of Revelation is very figurative with lots of imagery and symbols. Some say they interpret the book of Revelation literally (that is, as if it is devoid of images and symbols that have to be interpreted). None, without hypocrisy, can make that claim. No one reads the book of Revelation literally. Consider the description of the Beast (Rev. 13): seven heads, ten horns, comes up out of the sea. That could be literal. But no one in the Christian church considers this as an actual created monster. The dispensational school of thought often hypocritically criticizes those who do not agree with their interpretation as not being literal, and thus playing fast and loose with the text of Scripture. In fact, dispensationalists do not read the book of Revelation "literally". You must understand that the book of Revelation is very visionary, dramatic, and highly figurative. But, remember, God promises to tell us what it means (Rev. 17:7). Every Christian can take this clearly written book and make sense out of it, even though it is highly figurative.


----------------------- Next time: What is the book all about?-------------

Rev. Brian Schwertley's "Introduction to Revelation, Part 2"


This is a continuation of the summary of Rev. Brian Schwertley's first sermon in his current series on the book of Revelation. Part 1 of the summary is given again and shown in red.

You can listen to his sermon using the tiny player in the column on the right.

Introduction to Revelation

Rev. Brian Schwertley -- March 18, 2007

Rev. Schwertley opens by reading all of chapter 1 (3.5 minutes).The book of Revelation is the most popular book of the Bible among evangelicals because of pre-millennial dispensationalism. This point of view teaches that the book of Revelation had nothing to do with the generation when it was written. Most in this camp teach the erroneous idea that the book of Revelation can not be understood until the end of human history, which they say is our generation, or the generation that came to be when Israel became a state in 1948 (i.e., Lindsey, Walvoord, Dallas Theological Seminary). Books on this subject from the premillennial dispensational point of view are very popular. They read like entertaining, fascinating novels. Tim LaHaye and his co-author have made millions of dollars with this genre of books. Unfortunately these books are fantasy and fiction, based on an incorrect interpretation of Scripture. The speculations of these authors, however, provides for entertaining reading. These authors claim to interpret Scriptures literally, but their speculations are anything but literal. Rev. Schwertley recommends his listeners read Dr. Dwight Wilson's Dallas Theological Seminary PhD. thesis "Armageddon Now!" which traces the history of the premilennial dispensational interpretations in connection with the current events of the times.The book of Revelation is difficult to interpret. It is essential that the interpreter use proper techniques of interpretation.Rev. Schwertley claims that much interpretation of our day uses much speculation instead of sound interpretive principles.Proper interpretive techniques include the following:1. One must take account of the genre of the book of Revelation. It is inspired apocalyptic literature. It communicates ideas through a system of symbolism. Instead of attempting to interpret the symbols literally (which is impossible and absurd), or apply newspaper headline exegesis; rather, one must use Scripture to interpret Scripture. So one must find other places in Scripture where the various symbols and terms are used, and find out what they mean there. Any other approach is arbitrary. Rev. Schwertley illustrates the sound approach to interpretation using Rev. 6:12 (giant earthquake -- Ex. 19, Ps. 18, 60, Is. 13, 24, Nahum 1; sun became as black as sackcloth -- Ex. 10, Job 9, Is. 5, 24, Ez. 32, Joel 2, Amos 8, Micah 3; moon became as blood -- Job 25, Is. 13, 24, Ex. 32, Joel 2). John's audience would have been familiar with these symbols of divine judgment.2. The interpreter must seek to discover how the original audience would have understood this book. Any other approach is guess work and arbitrary. It is absurd to say that John wrote a book to encourage his audience and that only an audience 2000 years later would be able to understand it. When ordinary language is insufficient, the Bible uses symbolic language to evoke associations which have been established in the Bible's own literary art. While the book of Revelation does not quote the Old Testament, it constantly alludes to Old Testament symbols, types, and doctrines. Thus to interpret the book of Revelation properly one must have a solid grasp of Old Testament prophetic imagery. Use a concordance to find the Old Testament passages that use the various symbols and images found in the book of Revelation. This approach is much better than reading Hal Lindsey (except for the entertainment factor). The seven mountains in Rev. 17:9 would communicate immediately to first century Christians living in Asia Minor the city of Rome (or possibly Jerusalem), but definitely not San Francisco nor Seattle. Some symbols are defined in the immediate context. For example, the seven stars are the angels (probably the pastors of the churches) of the seven churches (Rev. 1:20). The seven candelsticks are the seven churches. So there are seven churches and the messengers of those churches.
3. Revelation can only be properly interpreted if one understands that many of the prophetic events discussed in the book are imminent to the original recipients of the prophecies (partial preterism).
There are three main schools of thought concerning the book of Revelation:
(1) historicism (Martin Luther, John Calvin) - the book of Revelation is a panorama of all of church history. One problem with this view is that all the commentators with this view come to different conclusions. Thus a historicist preacher must be very general and vague in his preaching (i.e., Richard Bacon), because if you get specific you could immediately be proved wrong by history;
(2) dispensational premillennialism - previously discussed; and
(3) partial preterism (Greg Bahnsen, David Chilton, Kenneth Gentry) - this is not the damnable heresy of full preterism (Rev. Schwertley has done a 14 part series refuting full preterism which is available at
http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?sortby=oldest&keyword=Brian%5ESchwertley&keywordWithin=Preterism&keywordDesc=Brian+Schwertley&SpeakerOnly=true&currSection=sermonsspeaker&AudioOnly=false
).
A lot of things in the book of Revelation have already been fulfilled (most by A.D. 70), others have not (i.e., the second coming and the final judgment). This, of course, places the date of the book of Revelation prior to A.D. 70, not in 95 or 96 A.D. (Rev. Schwertley then reads a lengthy quote from Walvoord's commentary on Revelation which explains the origin for the later date. Schwertley also mentions and finds persuasive, Dr. Kenneth Gentry's book in support of the earlier date, "Before Jerusalem Fell".)
In support of the earlier date are the following: (1) All the time indicators in the book of Revelation point to the "nearness" of many of the prophetic events (Rev. 1:1,3; 22:6,7,10,12,20). Rev. Schwertley then takes several minutes to explain the Greek terms behind the time indicators and unreasonableness in most cases of attempted futurist interpretations placing the fulfillments centuries of years laters.
The earlier date is supported by the following:
(1) the city of Jerusalem not yet destroyed (Rev. 11); the temple (original, not a future rebuilt temple) and altar is referenced (11:1); city of Jerusalem (11:8) to be trod underfoot by Gentiles for 42 months (11:2);
(2) the mystical number 666 (Rev. 13:18) when written in Hebrew letters is equivalent to Nero Caesar. Rev. 17:10 identifies the Beast and reigning emperor (the sixth emperor) as Nero (A.D. 64-68). The actual historical events fit perfectly with the book of Revelation;
(3) Revelation presents the judgments prophesied as imminent to the generation responsible for the crucifixion of Christ (Rev. 1:7) - Christ is describing, not His bodily return, but speaking symbolically of a coming in judgment (coming on the clouds: Gen. 15:17; Ex. 13:21-22, 14:19-20, 24, 16:19, 19:9; Ps. 18:8-14, 104:3; Is. 19:1; Ex. 32:7-8; Matt. 24:30; Mark 14:62; Acts 2:19). Rev. Schwertley finds amillennial efforts to get around the plain meaning of the Greek words unpersuasive. Also Rev. 14:14,19,20 uses imagery of Christ sitting on a cloud judging the earth (i.e., land). The vine of the land is apostate Israel which is being excommunicated and judged by God. The Jews rejected Christ's sacrificial death and His blood was shed outside the city. This great crime of Israel in rejecting and killing the Messiah is an allusion to Isaiah 5:1-7 where Israel is called God's vineyard. Another strong indicator that this passage refers to the Jews of Christ's time is the statement in Revelation 1:7 borrowed from Zechariah 12:10 (those who see Christ are the ones responsible for His death, the apostate Jews who rejected Christ, according to Peter in Acts 5:10, 23:36. Further, the Jews accepted responsibility for Christ's death, Matthew 27:25). A quote from Milton Terry is given in support of this view.
Rev. Schwertley comments that Revelation is a difficult book to interpret and different interpretations are not a test of fellowship.
4. Revelation is a prophecy, and thus should be understood in the same manner as other prophetical writings. Revelation is not given to satisfy our curiosity and entertain us about the future (pretribulation rapture view), but to move to ethical conduct and give hope. Prophecy is given so we will be more holy, so we will be more diligent in looking to Christ, and being faithful to Christ; for us to repent and follow and obey Christ; not so we can have prophecy conferences and fantasize about the future (Rev. 1:3). The audience of the book of Revelation are told they are going to be persecuted, they are not going to have food to eat (Rev. 16:15; 22:7,14). Fear God, live a holy life. The book of Revelation is a classic example of prophetic covenant lawsuit preaching. Consider the Old Testament prophets. As God's messengers, they brought charges against God's unfaithful covenant people, threatened God's judgement, called the people to repentance, and promised blessings for repentance and renewed faithfulness. The book of Revelation should, to a large part, be viewed as God's covenant wrath against apostate Israel. Israel had replaced God's law with man-made traditions, persecuted God's prophets, and murdered the sinless Son of God (see Matthew 23:29-36 for Christ's words and woes to the scribes and Pharisees and pronouncement that judgment for all those things would come to that generation, i.e., the Great Tribulation of A.D. 70; Matt. 21:33-43, 23:29-38; 1 Thess. 2:14-16). God is divorcing Israel, the great harlot (Rev. 17:1,5), for spiritual adultery, and taking the kingdom away from her and giving it to His new bride, Christ's church (international, trans-cultural, and spiritual).
Revelation can only be understood if one takes into account the intent of the author and the meaning in the first century era. The book of Revelation is a revelation of God to His first century persecuted audience.
So, (1) Scripture interprets Scripture, (2) it is crucial to know how the original audience interpreted these things, (3) the time indicators are important and (4) the book of Revelation must be looked at ethically.

Audio Resources from Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen


The late scholar Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen had many helpful things to say about the subjects of our study on this blog. Just to name a few (more later):


Five Lectures on "Tribulation or Transformation":

1. The Great Tribulation: Matthew 24:1-21 - part I - 1 of 5

2. The Great Tribulation: Matthew 24:1-21 - part II - 2 of 5

3. Overview of Postmillennialism - 3 of 5

4. Overview of Amillennialism vs Postmillennialism - 4 of 5

(Earl may want to carefully listen to this one. Later, I will be asking Earl about the problems with Amillennialism. Dr. Bahnsen at one time held to the Amillennial position and became convinced that Postmillennialism was more Biblical.)

5. Overview of the Law in the New Testament - 5 of 5


For $1.99 per message you can download these at the following link:


Interpreting Matthew 24


Jesus left the temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. But he answered them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” (Matthew 24:1, ESV)


Matthew chapter 24 is an interesting chapter. Jesus says some remarkable things that different groups interpret in various ways -- I'll discuss four:
Futurist
All Jesus describes in Matthew 24 has not happened yet and happen sometime in the future.
Preterist
All Jesus describes in Matthew 24 happened in the past around 70 AD.
Failed Preterist
Jesus and the Gospel authors meant the words to fit within the disciples' generation, but one or more of the prophecy failed. This is popular in a growing segment of skeptical biblical scholars.
Eclectic
Some of what Jesus said in Matthew 24 happened in 70 AD. Some of it continues to happen. Some if it has not happened yet. Jesus returning in glory with loud trumpets has not happened yet.


Each of these views have problems. I am assuming that Matthew was written prior to 70 AD, although it does not make that much difference if passage was written later. I will concentrate on what the original audience probably thought about the passage. Looking at the disciples reaction to Jesus' words provides clues how those hearing this in the first century would think about the passage. I they would understand it in the following way:
  1. The events are going to start within the normal life span of the disciples (v. 34).
  2. The gospel will be preached to the whole world before the end happens (v. 14).
  3. Events listed as birth pangs that will signal that the end is coming, but the end is not here yet (v. 6-7). These birth pangs include:
    • False Christs.
    • Wars.
    • Famine.
    • Earthquakes.

  4. Events which will defile the temple and Jerusalem, called the abomination of desolation, will signal a great tribulation is imminent. People with Jewish heritage then would remember Antiochus Epiphanes and his desecration of the Second Temple. Those who are alert will be able to see the signs and flee (v. 15-20).
  5. The comming of Christ will be sudden and visible to all (v. 27). It will have the following properties:
    • All nations and tribes will see (v. 30).
    • It will be unmistakable, accompanied by loud trumpet, great glory (v. 31).
    • All the elect is seperated from the non-elect and gathered at this time (v. 31).
    • Accompanied by abrupt changes in the heavens (v. 29).

  6. No one knows the time of Christ's return (v. 36), and it seems this will be the case until just before Christ's return.
  7. The events seem to all take place in quick succession (v. 29).
  8. All that is described will absolutely occur (v. 35).


None of the various views (Futurist, Preterist, Failed Preterist, Eclectic) appear to fit the list of observations perfectly. People in each perspective will claim with correct analysis, their view will fit perfectly. So far, I have not seen any analysis that perfectly explains Matthew 24. I am not saying that there is no correct analysis or the correct way that Matthew 24 should be understood which would eliminate all the issues -- I'm sure there is. Perhaps its been in front of my nose all the time but in my stupidty and stubborness I do not see it. 

I'll walk through each of these and discuss these observations. I'll look at the strengths and weaknesses of each view.  I will start with the Futurist veiw, followed by the Preterist view, the Failed Preterist view, and finally the Eclictic view. The view that I refer to as Failed Preterist is not a term to be derogatory about the Preterist view. It simply refers to a people who view that Jesus predicted the end of the world within the disciples' lifetime and think that Jesus was wrong. I examine the Eclectic view last because it picks things from the Futurist view and Preterist view.

Futurist
There are two types of Futurists: Historical Premillennialists and Dispensational Premillennialists. Dispensational by far is the most popular view today, although it is a a relatively young view. Historical Premillennialism had supporters for it dating almost all the way back to the "apostolic fathers". Historical does not have the concept of the rapture of the church.

Strengths -- Futurist's strengths are their concern for upholding the literal reading of the Bible. However, the futurist's blind spot is not recognizing how much they alagorize and symbolize the Bible. The strengths include:

  1. Recognizes the gospel goes to the entire world (2).
  2. Recognizes the birth pang aspects of many of the signs (3).
  3. Recognizes the terrible tribulation accompanying the abomination of desolation (4).
  4. Recognizes the coming of Christ will be visible to all (part of 5).
  5. Recognizes the events take place in quick succession, in the span of less than a decade.
  6. Commitment to these prophecies being true and will come to pass.
Weaknesses -- While futurists claim to read the Bible literally, there are many ways where the read passages outside of their plain, ordinary sense. With respect to Matthew 24, there problems are:
  1. The events happen in the distant future for the disciples, violating (1). None of that generation will be alive for these events. There has to be some creative exegesis to get around this issue.
  2. For Dispensational Premillennialists, there will be a seven year warning when Christ's second coming will occur, violating (6). When the secret rapture of Christ happens, there will be a seven year count down to when Christ will come again in visible glory. Historical Premillennialists do not have this problem, because there is no secret Rapture for them.
Preterist
Preterists' greatest strengths are their serious commitment to the prophecy being fulfilled within the same generation of the disciples. Preterist try to follow the literal sense of the Bible. Of anyone, Preterists are the one who understand the nearness of escatological language in the Bible.

Strengths -- The Preterists have a number of strengths:

  1. The events were going to complete by 70 AD, well within the normal life span of the disciples (1).
  2. The recognition of birth pangs (3). Preterists recognize that there would be wars and rumors of wars, earthquakes and famine that would point to the future return of Christ, but would not mean it would happen immediately. That said, the birth pangs and relatively short, historically speaking, only lasting a few decades from when Christ made his prophetic statements.
  3. Recognizing the terrible tribulation accompanying the abomination of desolation (4).
  4. The coming of Christ is sudden -- but not visible to all (5).
  5. No one could predict when Christ return until the Roman army blockaded Jerusalem (6).
  6. The events take place in quick succession (7).
  7. The Preterist view asserts that all the Christ predicted did come true (8).
Weaknesses -- Preterism has a couple of major weaknesses:
  1. The gospel was not close to being preached to the whole world in 70 AD (2). The gospel did not reach the northen european tribes, extend throught Africa, throughout Asia, the Americas, and Australia. Preterists claim that peoples from all the known world were present at Pentecost and so that was the intent of the preaching prophecy.
  2. The coming of Christ was not visible to all in the world in 70 AD (5). R.C. Sproul and Gary DeMar claim that Christ made the appearence that was talked about in Matthew 24. However, the appearance was not accompanied by great glory for all the world to see. It was not loud (with trumpet call). Sproul talks about how Josephus writes that there were signs in the clouds around Jerusalem at the destruction of the temple. Even if Josephus' signs in the sky are to be taken as the manifestation of Christ coming in the clouds, it was not visible outside the environs of Jerusalem. The rest of the world did not take note of it that day.
Failed Preterist
The major weakness of the Failed Preterist view is their low view of scripture. Usually this view is the position of radical skeptics to the Christian faith.

Strengths -- The primary strengths of this view is that it holds that Christ and the very early Christians believed in all that Christ is said to have predicted in Matthew 24.

Weaknesses -- The major weakness of this view is that while Jesus might have gotten the destruction of the temple right, he did not get his second coming correct. Thus people holding this view believe that Jesus failed in his prophecy.

Eclectic
Eclecticism is almost a middle ground between Futurism and Preterism. It picks the strengths of Futurism and Preterism while trying to avoid the major weaknesses of either.

Strengths -- The strengths of this view include:

  1. This recognizes Matthew 24 predicts the destruction of the temple that happened in 70 AD. The destruction occurred well within the normal lifespan of the disciples (1).
  2. This recognizes that the gospel will be preached to the whole world before Christ returns (2).
  3. Recognizes there will be birth pangs that will signal that the end is coming (3). For the Eclectic view, the birth pangs are recognized as a long process, spanning millennia. They argue that these pangs remind us that we are to be ready at all times.
  4. Recognizes there will be a terrible tribulation accompanying the abomination of desolation (4). With the Preterist, the Eclectic view recognizes that Jesus was referring to destruction of the temple in Matthew 24.
  5. Recognizes that the coming of Christ will be sudden and visible to all (5).
  6. Recognizes that no one will know the time of Christ's return (6).
  7. Affirms that all that is described will absolutely occur (8).
Weaknesses -- The weaknesses of this view are:
  1. The biggest weakness of this view is that there is a very long interval from the start of the great tribulation to the time that Christ returns (violating 7).


As I evaluate the various perspectives, I immediately rule out Failed Preterism because I believe that all of Christ's words will happen. Secondly, I rule out Futurism because it is very obvious to me that Jesus was referring to the destruction of the temple in 70 AD in Matthew.

I am left with Preterism and Eclectism. I greatly respect both views. Between these two, I think Eclectism is the stronger position because Preterism fails to see how that the appearance of Christ in Matthew 24 is the second coming of Christ that everyone will see. Christ's appearance is described in such strong terms, in Matthew 24, and elsewhere, that I cannot see any real corresponence to the events of 70 AD to Christ's appearance as described in the passage. Further, I do not see the advance of the gospel to all the world in Preterism that is told in Matthew 24.

So I am left with Eclictisim. But what about its major weakness, the huge discontinuity between the tribulation of the destruction of the temple and the second coming of Christ? I admit this is not easily dismissed, but compared to the problems of Preterism with Matthew 24, this is not nearly as huge of a problem in my mind. Breifly, I see this as an aspect of "telescoping" in biblical prophecy, where one aspect of prophecy is fulfilled but the other is fulfilled later. Many of the Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah show this. The Messiah was described in some ways as a suffering messiah, but also in other ways  a victorious ruler. Christ's first coming showed more strongly the suffering nature of the prophecies. Christ's second coming will show the victorious aspects of the prophecies. Think of it as looking across a valley to a moutain range. As you survey the vista all the mountains look like one chain. However, if you drive to the range you discover what looked like one range is actually a series of mountain ranges, one after another, seperated by many miles. A similar thing is going on with the prophecy of Matthew 24. From the initial perspective of the disciples, the destruction of the temple and the end of the world looked one and the same to them. A careful examination of Jesus' words actually show these are seperate concepts. Our experience of two thousand intervening years show the expansion of this prophecy.

I analogize the positions of Futurism, Preterism, and Ecleticism with the great theological story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears.

Once upon a time, Goldilocks on one fine morning was walking in the woods and came the House of the Three Escatological Bears. The bears were out on their morning walk and in a deep passionate discussion of the fine points of end times. They were so absorbed in their discussion that the bears forgot to shut the door and left their breakfast of porridge on the table.

Goldilocks entered the front door and smelled the porridge. She got up on the Futurist Bear's chair and sampled the bowl, "Oh my, too hot with the cares of the future and escaping from them in a Rapture."

Goldilocks then moved over to the Preterist Bear's chair and tasted the porridge. "Oh my, too cold. The porridge was put in the bowl too long in the past. No warmth."

Goldilocks then moved over to the Eclictic Bear's chair and tasted the porridge. "Oh my goodness! this is neither too hot or too cold, it tastes just right."

Now, I know many of you right now are thinking of another line were it was said you are neither hot nor cold. Just goes to show you how analogies break down.

This is my initial look at Matthew 24. It makes the most sense to me. As I have discussed this topic with others I've seen people are place different weights on the strengths and weaknesses I've listed above. There is much more analysis that needs to be done than what I spent in this brief blog entry.


Taking a Stab at Some of Earl's Questions

Earl asked me some questions in an earlier comment on my earlier post and I said I would get back to him. So my answers don't get buried, I have put them in a new post with his earlier questions in italics.

In your view, asks Earl, does 70 AD cover all of Matthew 24?

Yep. The events around 70 AD, that is the destruction of the temple that was never rebuilt, were predicted to shortly take place in Matthew 24 and in Revelation.

A hypothetical question from Earl. If Dr. Gentry were to discover substantial evidence that Revelation was written in 95 AD that overturned his previous research, how would that change your interpretation of Revelation?

Dr. Gentry and others have given me insight into eschatology. If Gentry changes his opinion and opts for the scholars that lived around 300 AD, say, my opinion doesn't change, Earl. I take literally that these events would happen shortly. Dispensationalists don't take shortly literally, but they maintain so much else is literal and look for the signs, which keep changing ever so often when predictions don't pan out. When Scripture is symbolic, I take it biblically, matching Scripture for Scripture, but I don't take it literally. So much is symbolic in Revelation.

Earl. I am agnostic [sic] on the date of Revelation myself. Depending on the day of the week, I think it is written before 70 AD. Other days I think it is written around 95 AD.

Do you mean you are a non-believer by "agnostic"! That's an interesting term for indecision. It's good to be flexible, but I like the Scripture that says that these events will happen shortly. That is my belief and that is why I go with the earlier date.

I remember wondering years ago before I bought into any eschatology why Revelation was written so late when the other books of the New Testament were written earlier. I was taught that Revelation is prophecy just like Old Testament books are prophecy. Now I believe that 19 chapters out of 22 of Revelation are history, albeit what became symbolic history written by John in prison to his seven churches. It became history because the symbolism happened after the seven churches got this symbolically-rich letter and saw the events unfold.

Am I correct in assuming that you believe that the events surrounding 70 AD is the history that was fulfilled through Revelation 19 asks Earl of me?

Yep!

In your view, he says, the apostasy has not happened--correct? So I would assume you can't say whether the millennium has started or not--correct?

Yep. I don't know if the apostasy or the millennium have happened. If I did, I might make megabucks writing about it as Lindsey and LaHaye and Jenkins.

All I know is we are in the church age. The Messiah has come and has ascended into heaven. He will return. The term "millennium" is only written once I believe in Scripture. We have made most of our systems of eschatology over this term. I would not guess when the millennium is and if it is exactly 1000 years as dispensationalists do because in this case they take it literally; it could be symbolic for "a long time". Pretty much I shut down at Revelation 20 and wait to see the coming of the Lord and how, as some say, it will all pan out. I'm waiting to see the events unfold just as the seven churches were waiting to see the events unfold that already unfolded. While I'm waiting, I am hoping to grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Savior who sits on the throne.

The Seven Churches

John to the seven churches that are in Asia:

Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne, and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth.

To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. (Revelation 1:4-6, ESV)

John is writing to seven churches in Asia Minor. Click on the satellite photo on the left to get a larger picture of the region and location of the seven churches. But John is not just writing to these particular seven churches in history, John is also writing to all the churches throughout history after Christ's first coming until Christ's second coming in glory and power. Not only is John writing to churches collectively, but John is writing to Christians individually that make up the church.

From the first we see symbolism in play in Revelation. The number seven is used both literally because there are seven real churches Revelation is addressed to. But seven is also figuratively -- seven represents the full or complete number and hence indicates Revelation is written to the full church. Seven is also used to refer to the Holy Spirit ("seven spirits who are before his throne"). In this sense, seven only has figurative significance. The language of Revelation is symbolic imagery. We need to keep that in mind as we read and listen to the book.

John tells the seven churches, and also to us that we have grace and peace from God. We often forget the magnitude of this news. We deserve God's wrath for our sin, but instead we have grace and are at peace with God. We are freed from our sins through Christ's death which is the basis of our being at peace with God. This is great news!

There is more great news. God the Father reigns from his throne, Jesus has conquered death and being the first born implies we will follow in his steps. Further, Jesus rules the kings of the earth. No matter what we see in the world, Christ is ruling over the kings of the world. Not only that -- we rule also. All who belong to Christ are a kingdom of priests, we are intermediaries between God and the human race. This is a high calling.

God is ruling now. Christ has conquered death. We live in God kingdom as priests. We have been given great grace. As we go on in Revelation we will see how God reigns and how we conquer.