Russia develops new unknown missile. British newspaper raises fears in the West
Russia launches arms race with new intercontinental ballistic missile
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/8260460/Russia-launches-arms-race-with-new-intercontinental-ballistic-missile.html
The new missile is not even named, started development in 2009. It will replace the aging SS-18 Satan. It seems it is not RS-24 that seems to be an upgrade of Topol-M.
Telegraph quotes the general commander of Russia's Strategic Rocket Forces, that SS-18 has up to 500 times greater power than the bomb in Japan. Let estimate - the two bombs dropped on Japan were 13-18 kt and 21 kt. So let take the 20kt as a measure. Then it seems SS-18 has up to 10 megaton power.
If we divide 10000kt by 550kt warheads that many of the missiles have, we get 18 warheads in each missile. If we divide by 200kt we get 50 warheads each missile.
The perspective of having "only 10" real warheads with 1 megaton each, is no less frightening.
That is something new. Alex Jones in an interview with Paul Craig Roberts mentioned that SS-18 has "24 warheads". That was a surprise, knowing the official information that SS-18 has "only" 10 real warheads and 40 dummy. Now we understand that Alex Jones didn't make an error, rather the ratio of real warheads may vary depending on their capability/weight. As we saw above, if all the warheads are smaller, they could be up to 50 real ones. It is understandable the fears of all US administrations of this particular missile codenamed Satan, an their attempts to get this missile canceled.
How about the new one? Why is Telegraph afraid already now, if the missile will be ready in 2017 when the West will have much more advanced tech like Aurora Triangle TR-3B or antimissile system in place? In fact the West already have them. Then we must assume Telegraph and its superiors know more than we are told.
Only a suggestion - could the "failed Bulava" December 9, 2009, followed by ICBM test in Ural, both producing spirals (more clearly visible from Norway, nevertheless the Ural one is also a spiral), be in fact the tests of the new capabilities of the unknown missile? How would be possible to claim the new missile will be able to penetrate ANY antimissile defense, that may include laser or other hi-tech? Just a suggestion - by going thru the hyperspace, as shown in the wormhole of the Norway spiral. By the way, the wormhole forming in the center of the spiral was shown clearly only on the Russian video posted the same day on RT youtube. It was not shown on the pictures and videos taken from Norway territory. That is to tell us the video on RT is made from a different angle most probably from Russian territory.
A clear wormhole is shown also over Thailand, we don't know anything about it.
If this is the case, if the new missile has hyperspace capabilities, let those hostile ET be aware too. It is not a surprise, since TR3B plane has hyperspace capabilities and also perhaps B2. Why not to put the same tech on a missile then? A hyperspace jump can bring the missile over any planet, not only to reach USA. And I doubt that Russia will attack USA because the planet Earth is quite small, rather will seek a peaceful solution to the problems at home.
As we suggested after the Norway spiral (on Russian territory), this is a demonstration for the coming ET war. We can only guess who is who, but we know who is not behind - those ET who are behind the secret US programs. Otherwise they would appear to fight with themselves, that is out of logic. How pity the ET researchers maintain some ideas that would lead to logical absurd. May be they are instructed to speak so. Here I mean in first place Mr Hoagland, and in lesser degree David Wilcock, Michael Salla and Alfred Webre. All of them try to explain how the objects over Russian and also Chinese territory are neither produced by these countries nor by friendly to them ET. In the process of convincing us, those researchers make factual errors (as of the appearance of Kremlin pyramid not in 2009 but before 2006 may be even before 1990 during USSR time), or they simply omit the facts they are not permitted to discuss, as the Chinese spiral in 1988.
