Two groups of ecopolitics, insiders and researchers emerge on the scene. Who of them might be closer to Jesus, or none?

Benjiamin Fulford attacks the former Jesuit general Kolvenbach, accusing him in satanism. This is the latest in a programmed presentation of Fulford trying to explain the current state of world affairs with insider struggle between factions of Illuminati, bankers and other groups of elite. He, being representative of White and Black Dragon societies in Japan, tries to involve in his picture both old and new powers, including China. In the name of a fictional "anti-NWO" agenda, he de facto proposes an alternative world order to the current one - i.e. a kind of NWO, only not called with these words. Quite smart, if you do not know what the goals of a NWO are - because they are exactly what Fulford proposes.

David Wilcock follows the same way, believing almost blindly every word that Fulford says. In his long 4 parts of "China October surprise", David Wilcock didn't find a place to tell us what the surprise is, after all. In January 2011 he finally declared China was contacted by ET (along with Russia, Indfia and Brazil) but without giving any details except for India Daily articles. And as a result China attacked the US (Grey, others) spaceships and special "assets" of ET technology. About the contacts, we have no doubts because we have seen on youtube and Chinese based videos the gigantic pyramids similar to that over Kremlin. But we have doubts that China would attack with torsion fields USA in the time when the Chinese president was on his first official visit to USA after Obama election.

The latest long article of Wilcock that we discussed, was especially designed to hit the Christian belief in the prophecies of End Times. Now Fulford follows that line, accusing the ex-general of the Jesuit order Hans Kolvenbach, ....of satanism. Fulford quotes a secret telephone tape that he doesn't release at the same time. It looks like the blackmail good for a bad Hollywood movie. Both Wilcock and Fulford pretend to be "anti-NWO" and to seek and offer better ways for humanity nearing 2012. But what they offer is in essence a kind of a new world order, only not named in that way. Now - with an explicit and strong anti-religious agenda. Of course, neither of them is influential enough to make that happen in reality, but they may be speakers of someone else.

At the same time, there is another groups of scientists and exo-politicians, who defend some kind of a new world (order) without associating with the so well known evil wording "NWO". They criticize the "truth embargo" of alien existence and the followed disasters for the humanity that could be prevented with  the available but still secret alien technology: free energy, desalinized water,  special medicine, etc that would be available after the ET Disclosure. At the same time, they accent on the political side and still believe that the current world governments will make the Disclosure if pushed harder. Those people, like Drs Stephen Bassett, Steven Greer, A. Webre, (and here I will put also R. Hoagland) often mention in their lectures the good connections with the Vatican and there is no problem for the aliens from religious point of view. They seem not to believe in the existence of evil aliens, rather seek the benefit for the humanity regardless of the alien agendas.

Both of them or mostly all of them denounce the "Armageddon" understanding an earthly or human-ET war, and intentionally or non-intentionally (unlikely) putting aside the real meaning of that word - the final battle between Jesus' armies and those of Satan and Antichrist. Seems most of those researchers don't really believe in the Revelation as coming from a  Divine source (or seeing in the future timelines as some of them would say).I don't want to assume, that some of them already play on the side of the Antichrist, and want to make us believe the final victory of Jesus Christ and his heavenly/space armies will never happen.

I don't know who of these emerging two groups is closer to the true Church and the unaltered Gospel. Seems both go their own way, that hides the danger of Aliens that may have quite a close encounter with the emerging Antichrist. Especially if he will rise after 2012 with the help of alien technology and even armies. Who of these excellent otherwise researchers will resist the temptation, and who will submit to it, as seems to be Dr Michio Kaku? I would not believe people who openly reject the Gospel and the book of Revelation. The problem is when some of them seem to almost accept it, and later show their real nature.

Perhaps after the first rapture (out of 3) it will become clearer who defends what agenda.
Let remember the words of Jesus: "And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch." (Mark 13:37)